The Resurrection Of Jesus A New Historiographical...

This paper is a review of the book The Resurrection of Jesus: A New Historiographical Approach by Michael Licona. This book is comprised of pages that â€Å"investigate the question of the historicity of Jesus’ resurrection while providing unprecedented interaction with the literature of professional historians outside of the community of biblical scholars on both hermeneutical and methodological considerations.† The book is separated into five long chapters: â€Å"Chapter 1: Important Consideration pertaining to Historical Truth† , â€Å"Chapter 2: The Historians and Miracles†, â€Å"Chapter 3: Historical Sources Pertaining to the Resurrection of Christ†, â€Å"Chapter 4: The Historical Bedrock Pertaining to the Fate of Jesus†, and â€Å"Chapter 5: Weighing Hypothesis†. Licona tackles the research of world historians who interpreted relevant data and draw their own conclusions. Evidence throughout the book proves Licona’s in terest in horizons and objectivity. He outlines several strategies for eliminating bias perspectives and public appeals. It is evident that knowing the past involves many challenges. Therefore, since the past is forever gone, it can never be viewed directly nor reconstructed. Chapter 1 deals with a significant considerations pertaining to historical truth. Licona surveyed several topics on how historians gain the extent of knowledge and the validity of truth. Historians gained assistance by initiating investigations and developing steps to minimize biases, the need for aShow MoreRelatedApologetics Application Paper Part 2 Submission Form Jeremy Story861 Words   |  4 Pagesto have allowed human life to exist that it is unlikely that it was the result of chance. B. Defense of Jesus’ Resurrection 1. The Risen Christ was seen by a multitude of witnesses. 2. The witness of women was included even though during this time in ancient history the witness of women was held in low regard. 3. The Gospel accounts indeed tell the same story. 4. There is medical evidence Jesus could not have survived the crucifixion. VI. Conclusion 4. Bibliography Beilby, James. Thinking about ChristianRead MoreAnnotated Bibliography Of The New Historicism2440 Words   |  10 PagesBibliography Assemble for New Historicism New historicism was born in the end of 1970s. It is one of the most important theories of literary criticism. It is different from the old historicism. New historicism stressed that the implementation of a comprehensive reading of texts from political power, ideology, cultural hegemony perspectives, formalism. Its research focuses on literature and life, literature and history, literature and power discourse. The New historicism breaks the kind of wordplay